I’ve come up with a test that shows the differences between these GPUs and other Macs… The BruceX benchmarkīruceX is a small Final Cut Pro X XML file that you import into Final Cut Pro. MacBook Pro late-2013 Intel Iris Pro Graphics 1GB 19.2 seconds MacBook Pro late-2013 Discrete GeForce GT 750M 2GB 18.8 seconds It turns out that the test wasn’t tough enough to show a difference between the two GPUs: Over at the the FCP.co forum, qbe asked me to do the ‘Far Far Away’ test on my new late 2013 MacBook Pro 15″ using only the built-in Iris Pro Graphics and also on only the Discrete GeForce GT 750M GPU which I included in my BTO Mac. This test puts enough pressure on main memory and GPU memory to separate older generation Macs from more recent computers.
#FINAL CUT PRO FOR MAC OS X 10.7.5 1080P#
The Intel Iris and Iris Pro are every bit the match or master of discrete NVIDIA Mobile GPUs - at least when it comes to OpenCL acceleration.Īlthough it is great news that integrated GPUs are getting better, many are worried that the MacBook Pros should be avoided until Iris Pro has improved a little more.Ī speed test proposed by FCP.co was to time the render of Final Cut Pro X’s built-in ‘Far Far Away’ title on a 23.975 1080p timeline. In the past we sneered at the integrated GPUs and their puny performance. Editors want to know if the integrated Intel Iris and Iris Pro Graphics GPUs are powerful enough to run professional software well.Įarly testing shows that Iris Pro graphics are better than many expected. New Mac software is depending more and more on GPU power.
To help people work out which Macs work best with Final Cut Pro X, it is useful to refer to a standard speed test.Īll but one of the MacBook Pros with Retina configurations do not have dedicated GPUs. BruceX: Try this new Final Cut Pro X benchmark
0 kommentar(er)
